ArticleNucleic acids research2003
Modulation of drug sensitivity in yeast cells by the ATP-binding domain of human DNA topoisomerase IIalpha.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deciphering linezolid-induced hematologic toxicity: Targeting TOP2A and TOP2B via its primary metabolite PNU142586.Science advances · 2025Article
- 1,2-Naphthoquinone as a Poison of Human Type II Topoisomerases.Chemical research in toxicology · 2021Article
- A non-canonical JAGGED1 signal to JAK2 mediates osteoblast commitment in cranial neural crest cells.Cellular signalling · 2019Article
- The Novel C-terminal Truncated 90-kDa Isoform of Topoisomerase IIMolecular pharmacology · 2018Article
- Molecular basis of the targeting of topoisomerase II-mediated DNA cleavage by VP16 derivatives conjugated to triplex-forming oligonucleotides.Nucleic acids research · 2006Article
- Characterization of the ATPase activity of topoisomerase II from Leishmania donovani and identification of residues conferring resistance to etoposide.The Biochemical journal · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epipodophyllotoxins are effective antitumour drugs that trap eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase II in a covalent complex with DNA. Based on DNA cleavage assays, the mode of interaction of these drugs was proposed to involve amino acid residues of the catalytic site. An in vitro binding study, however, revealed two potential binding sites for etoposide within human DNA topoisomerase IIalpha (htopoIIalpha), one in the catalytic core of the enzyme and one in the ATP-binding N-terminal domain. Here we have tested how N-terminal mutations that reduce the affinity of the site for etoposide or ATP affect the sensitivity of yeast cells to etoposide. Surprisingly, when introduced into full-length enzymes, mutations that lower the drug binding capacity of the N-terminal domain in vitro render yeast more sensitive to epipodophyllotoxins. Consistently, when the htopoIIalpha N-terminal domain alone is overexpressed in the presence of yeast topoII, cells become more resistant to etoposide. Point mutations that weaken etoposide binding eliminate this resistance phenotype. We argue that the N-terminal ATP-binding pocket competes with the active site of the holoenzyme for binding etoposide both in cis and in trans with different outcomes, suggesting that each topoisomerase II monomer has two non-equivalent drug-binding sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.