ArticleNucleic acids research2003
PANDORA: keyword-based analysis of protein sets by integration of annotation sources.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional inference by ProtoNet family tree: the uncharacterized proteome of Daphnia pulex.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- PANDORA: analysis of protein and peptide sets through the hierarchical integration of annotations.Nucleic acids research · 2010Article
- Software tool for researching annotations of proteins: open-source protein annotation software with data visualization.Analytical chemistry · 2009Article
- ClanTox: a classifier of short animal toxins.Nucleic acids research · 2009Article
- How to decide which are the most pertinent overly-represented features during gene set enrichment analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2007Article
- Cluster analysis of protein array results via similarity of Gene Ontology annotation.BMC bioinformatics · 2006Article
- ProTeus: identifying signatures in protein termini.Nucleic acids research · 2005Article
- A proteomic survey of rat cerebral cortical synaptosomes.Proteomics · 2005Article
- Automatic detection of false annotations via binary property clustering.BMC bioinformatics · 2005Article
- ProtoNet 4.0: a hierarchical classification of one million protein sequences.Nucleic acids research · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in high-throughput methods and the application of computational tools for automatic classification of proteins have made it possible to carry out large-scale proteomic analyses. Biological analysis and interpretation of sets of proteins is a time-consuming undertaking carried out manually by experts. We have developed PANDORA (Protein ANnotation Diagram ORiented Analysis), a web-based tool that provides an automatic representation of the biological knowledge associated with any set of proteins. PANDORA uses a unique approach of keyword-based graphical analysis that focuses on detecting subsets of proteins that share unique biological properties and the intersections of such sets. PANDORA currently supports SwissProt keywords, NCBI Taxonomy, InterPro entries and the hierarchical classification terms from ENZYME, SCOP and GO databases. The integrated study of several annotation sources simultaneously allows a representation of biological relations of structure, function, cellular location, taxonomy, domains and motifs. PANDORA is also integrated into the ProtoNet system, thus allowing testing thousands of automatically generated clusters. We illustrate how PANDORA enhances the biological understanding of large, non-uniform sets of proteins originating from experimental and computational sources, without the need for prior biological knowledge on individual proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.