Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14500439›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003

A nurse led education and direct access service for the management of urinary tract infections in children: prospective controlled trial.

Malcolm G Coulthard, Sue J Vernon, Heather J Lambert, John N S Matthews

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nappy pad urine samples for investigation and treatment of UTI in young children: the 'DUTY' prospective diagnostic cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
  8. Childhood urinary tract infection in primary care: a prospective observational study of prevalence, diagnosis, treatment, and recovery.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prevalence of urinary tract infection in acutely unwell children in general practice: a prospective study with systematic urine sampling.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Vesicoureteric reflux is not a benign condition.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2009
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malcolm G CoulthardDepartment of Paediatric Nephrology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle NE1 4LP. malcolm.coulthard@nuth.northy.nhs.uk
Sue J Vernon
Heather J Lambert
John N S Matthews
Royal Victoria Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether a nurse led education and direct access service improves the care of children with urinary tract infections.

designProspective cluster randomised trial.

settingGeneral practitioners in the catchment area of a UK paediatric nephrology department.

participants88 general practices (346 general practitioners, 107 000 children).

main outcome measuresRate and quality of diagnosis of urinary tract infection, use of prophylactic antibiotics, convenience for families, and the number of infants with vesicoureteric reflux in whom renal scarring may have been prevented.

resultsThe study practices diagnosed twice as many urinary tract infections as the control practices (6.42 v 3.45/1000 children/year; ratio 1.86, 95% confidence interval 1.42 to 2.44); nearly four times more in infants (age < 1 year) and six times more in children without specific symptoms. Diagnoses were made more robustly by study practices than by control practices; 99% v 89% of referred patients had their urine cultured and 79% v 60% had bacteriologically proved urinary tract infections (P < 0.001 for both). Overall, 294 of 312 (94%) children aged under 4 years were prescribed antibiotic prophylaxis by study doctors compared with 61 of 147 (41%) by control doctors (P < 0.001). Study families visited hospital half as much as the control families. Twice as many renal scars were identified in patients attending the study practices. Twelve study infants but no control infants had reflux without scarring.

conclusionA nurse led intervention improved the management of urinary tract infections in children, was valued by doctors and parents, and may have prevented some renal scarring.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriological TechniquesChildChild, PreschoolCicatrixFamily PracticeHealth EducationHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfantInfant, NewbornKidney DiseasesNurse PractitionersProspective StudiesRadionuclide ImagingReferral and ConsultationAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID14500439
PMCPMC196395
OpenAlexW2083558296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.