Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14500434›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003

Methylxanthines for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: meta-analysis of randomised trials.

R Graham Barr, Brian H Rowe, Carlos A Camargo

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Gold 2023: Highlights for primary care.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 Report: GOLD Executive Summary.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Doxofylline and theophylline: a comparative clinical study.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2012
    Article
  18. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Lancet (London, England) · 2012
    Review
  19. [Diagnosis and therapy of COPD exacerbation].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2012
    Review
  20. Acute lung failure.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

R Graham BarrDivision of General Medicine, PH-9 East Room 105, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Centre, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA. rgb9@columbia.edu
Brian H Rowe
Carlos A Camargo
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

SYSTEMS APPROACHES TO THE EPIDEMIOLOGY, GENETICS AND GENOMICS OF LUNG DISEASEST32HL007427 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI DAWN L DEMEO, Edwin K Silverman · 1985 to 2026
$13.6M
DIET AND CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASER01HL063841 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CAMARGO, CARLOS A. · 2000 to 2002
$1.0M
BHP HRSA HHS PE-11001NHLBI NIH HHS HL-07427NHLBI NIH HHS HL-63841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the addition of methylxanthines to standard treatments in patients presenting with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

designMeta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCE: The Cochrane airways review group's COPD register. Two reviewers independently selected articles for inclusion, assessed methodological quality, and extracted data. SELECTION OF STUDIES: Four trials met the inclusion criteria, with 169 patients.

main outcome measuresMean change in spirometry, clinical end points, symptom scores, and adverse events.

resultsMean change in forced expiratory volume at one second at two hours was similar in methylxanthine and placebo groups but transiently increased with methylxanthines at three days. Non-significant reductions in admissions to hospital and length of stay were offset by a non-significant increase in relapses at one week. Changes in symptom scores did not reach significance. Methylxanthines caused more nausea and vomiting than placebo (odds ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 12.6), and non-significant increases in tremor, palpitations, and arrhythmias were also observed.

conclusionsThe available data do not support the use of methylxanthines for the treatment of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Potential benefits of methylxanthines for lung function and symptoms were generally not confirmed at standard levels of significance, whereas the potentially important adverse events of nausea and vomiting were significantly increased in patients receiving methylxanthines.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAminophyllineBronchodilator AgentsForced Expiratory VolumeHumansInfusions, IntravenousPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTheophyllineTreatment OutcomeAminophyllineBronchodilator AgentsdoxofyllineTheophylline

Identifiers

PMID14500434
PMCPMC196388
OpenAlexW2159448749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.