Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14500299›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood2003

Does the use of a specialised paediatric retrieval service result in the loss of vital stabilisation skills among referring hospital staff?

P Ramnarayan, J Britto, A Tanna, D Thomas, S Alexander, P Habibi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P RamnarayanDepartment of Paediatrics, Imperial College School of Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Norfolk Place, London, UK.
J Britto
A Tanna
D Thomas
S Alexander
P Habibi
St Mary's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo compare the proportion of airway and vascular access procedures performed by referring hospital staff on critically ill children in two discrete time periods, before and after widespread use of a specialised paediatric retrieval service.

methodsTransport data were obtained from retrieval logs of all children for whom a paediatric retrieval team was launched in each of two time periods (October 1993 to September 1994; and October 2000 to September 2001).

resultsThe overall intubation rate was similar in the first and second time periods (83.9% v 79.1%). However, 31/51 (61%) retrieved children were intubated by referring hospital staff in 1993-94, compared to 227/269 (84%) in 2000-01. Referring hospital staff gained central venous access in 11% v 18% and arterial access in 22% v 19% of retrieved children in the first and second time periods respectively. This was in spite of a significant reduction in the proportion of children on whom these procedures were performed.

conclusionReferring hospital staff are performing a greater proportion of initial airway and vascular access procedures undertaken in the stabilisation of sick children retrieved by a specialised paediatric retrieval team. The provision of this service has not resulted in the loss of vital skills at the local hospital.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCatheterizationCatheterization, Central VenousChildChild Health ServicesCritical CareCritical IllnessEmergency Medical ServicesHumansIntubation, IntratrachealMedical Staff, HospitalPatient Care TeamProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationSpecialization

Identifiers

PMID14500299
PMCPMC1719337
OpenAlexW2030719546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.