ReviewCurrent urology reports2003
Update on overactive bladder: pharmacologic approaches on the horizon.
Review in Current urology reports, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practical management of nocturia in urology.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India · 2008Article
- Solifenacin in overactive bladder syndrome.Drugs · 2006Review
- Preview of new drugs for overactive bladder and incontinence: darifenacin, solifenacin, trospium, and duloxetine.Current urology reports · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Limitations exist with regard to the array of available agents for the pharmacologic therapy of overactive bladder, including issues of efficacy and tolerability. It is clear that the ideal agent for this condition has not been identified. However, several new pharmacologic treatments, including some with novel approaches to drug delivery, have emerged in clinical development over the past few years. These agents include a variety of anticholinergics and others. In initial studies, some of the agents appear to compare favorably with existing therapies. Whether these promising results will hold up when subjected to large-scale, well-controlled clinical trials is unclear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
14499063What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.