Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1429023›Full record

ArticleHistochemistry1992

Which fluorophore is brightest? A comparison of the staining obtained using fluorescein, tetramethylrhodamine, lissamine rhodamine, Texas red, and cyanine 3.18.

M W Wessendorf, T C Brelje

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Histochemistry, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Tear-mediated delivery of nanoparticles through transcytosis of the lacrimal gland.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2015
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sensitivity enhancement of fluorescence in situ hybridization on plant chromosomes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 1994
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M W WessendorfDepartment of Cell Biology and Neuroanatomy, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.
T C Brelje
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

NIDA NIH HHS DA 05466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are several red-emitting fluorophores available for immunofluorescence studies, including tetramethylrhodamine, lissamine rhodamine, Texas Red, and cyanine 3.18; however, it is unclear which of these is best. The present study compared the brightness of these fluorophores to that of fluorescein. Staining was attempted using a primary antibody raised against serotonin and a secondary antibody that was conjugated with either fluorescein or one of the red fluorophores. The intensity of staining was determined densitometrically. It was found that a conjugate of cyanine 3.18 provided significantly brighter staining that conjugates of any of the other fluorophores, including fluorescein. It is concluded that cyanine 3.18 should be useful for multicolor fluorescence experiments and that it may be the brightest fluorophore available for single-color fluorescence immunocytochemistry.

Indexed as

Fluorescent Antibody TechniqueAnimalsBrainDensitometryImmunohistochemistryMicroscopy, FluorescenceRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySerotoninSerotonin

Identifiers

PMID1429023
OpenAlexW2062132899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.