ArticleHistochemistry1992
Neural regulation of differentiation of rat skeletal muscle cell types.
Article in Histochemistry, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The denervated muscle: facts and hypotheses. A historical review.European journal of applied physiology · 2006Review
- Changes in some troponin and insulin-like growth factor messenger ribonucleic acids in regenerating and denervated skeletal muscles.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 1996Article
- Mammalian myoblasts become fast or slow myocytes within the somitic myotome.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 1994Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three monoclonal antibodies (LM5, F2 and F39) to the fast class of myosin heavy chain (MHC) were used to study the effect of denervation on the differentiation of muscle cell types in some rat skeletal muscles. Antibody LM5 in immunocytochemical investigations did not stain any myotubes during early fetal development but presumptive fast muscle cells started to stain during later fetal development. Unlike antibody LM5, antibodies F2 and F39 stained all myotubes during fetal development. The suppression of fast myosin heavy chains recognised in presumptive slow muscle cells was observed within 1-2 days after birth with antibody F39 but not until 10-14 days after birth with antibody F2. The emergence of subsets of fast muscle fibre types in rat extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and tibialis anteri (TA) detectable by F39 and F2 antibodies was not observed until 2-3 weeks after birth. Denervation of developing muscles led to marked changes in the expression of myosins identified by these antibodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.