ArticleInflammation1992
Bone-resorbing activity is expressed by rat macrophages in response to arthropathic streptococcal cell wall polymers.
Article in Inflammation, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Basis beyond Interrelated Bone Resorption/Regeneration in Periodontal Diseases: A Concise Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Staphylococcus aureus - induced tumor necrosis factor - related apoptosis - inducing ligand expression mediates apoptosis and caspase-8 activation in infected osteoblasts.BMC microbiology · 2003Article
- Phlogistic properties of peptidoglycan-polysaccharide polymers from cell walls of pathogenic and normal-flora bacteria which colonize humans.Infection and immunity · 1993Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Rat peritoneal macrophages stimulated in vivo by group A streptococcal peptidoglycan-polysaccharide (PG-APS) resorb bone as measured by solubilization of 45Ca from radiolabeled, devitalized bone chips. Activity was strain-dependent and correlated with the susceptibility of rat strains to PG-APS-induced arthritis. PG-APS-stimulated macrophages from the resistant Buf rat strain were not induced to resorb bone, but ingested equivalent concentrations of PG-APS compared to bone-resorbing macrophages from the arthritis-susceptible Lew strain. Resorptive activity peaked at three to five days and decreased to background levels by 10 days after injection. PG-APS-stimulated macrophages from congenitally athymic Lew rats were as effective as macrophages from heterozygous littermates at resorbing bone. Lew macrophages were also responsive to small, nonarthropathic PG-APS polymers generated by mutanolysin digestion. Resident peritoneal macrophages did not respond to stimulation by PG-APS in vitro. Indomethacin at a concentration of 10 micrograms/ml was an effective blockade against PG-APS-induced macrophage bone resorption in vitro, but catalase was ineffective. These results indicate that expression of rat macrophage bone-resorbing activity reflects genetic regulation of the response to PG-APS rather than a defect in ingestion of these polymers and imply that PG-APS-stimulated, bone-resorbing macrophages may contribute to early, initial bone destruction that occurs in inflammatory arthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.