Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1427787›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics

Polymerase chain reaction analysis of fragile X mutations.

S H Erster, W T Brown, P Goonewardena, C S Dobkin, E C Jenkins, R G Pergolizzi

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Laboratory testing for fragile X, 2021 revision: a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S H ErsterDepartment of Research, North Shore University Hospital, Cornell University Medical College, Manhasset, NY 11030.
W T Brown
P Goonewardena
C S Dobkin
E C Jenkins
R G Pergolizzi
Cornell University · USNew York State Office for People With Developmental Disabilities · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mutation that underlies the fragile X syndrome is presumed to be a large expansion in the number of CGG repeats within the gene FMR-1. The unusually GC-rich composition of the expanded region has impeded attempts to amplify it by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We have developed a PCR protocol that successfully amplifies the (CGG)n region in normal, carrier and affected individuals. The PCR analysis of several large fragile X families is presented. The PCR results agree with those obtained by direct genomic Southern blot analyses. These favorable comparisons suggest that the PCR assay may be suitable for rapid testing for fragile X mutations and premutations and genetic screening of at-risk individuals.

Indexed as

Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA-Binding ProteinsX ChromosomeBase SequenceBlotting, SouthernFemaleFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Fragile X SyndromeHumansMaleMolecular Sequence DataMutationNerve Tissue ProteinsOligonucleotide ProbesPedigreeRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidFMR1 protein, humanFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Nerve Tissue ProteinsOligonucleotide ProbesRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID1427787
OpenAlexW2083677818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.