Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1416079›Full record

ArticleAnatomy and embryology1992

Superfluousness of motor innervation for the formation of muscle spindles in neonatal rats.

J Kucera, J M Walro

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomy and embryology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Peripheral somatosensation: a touch of genetics.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2011
    Review
  2. Neuromuscular development in the absence of programmed cell death: phenotypic alteration of motoneurons and muscle.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2006
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J KuceraDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Boston University, MA 02118.
J M Walro
Boston University · USNortheast Ohio Medical University · US

Funding

DEVELOPMENTAL ORIGIN OF THE MUSCLE SPINDLER01NS025796 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI KUCERA, JAN · 1988 to 1996
–
NINDS NIH HHS 2R01NS25796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle spindles form de novo in reinnervated muscles of neonatal rats treated with nerve growth factor. Whether the spindles can also form in muscle reinnervated only by afferents was investigated by removing the lumbosacral segment of the spinal cord immediately after crushing the nerve to the medial gastrocnemius muscle at birth, and administering nerve growth factor for 10 days afterwards. As predicted, the medial gastrocnemius muscles were reinnervated by afferents, but not efferents. No motor endplates were visible on any muscle fibers, and extrafusal fibers were atrophied. The reinnervated muscles contained spindle-like encapsulations of one to four fibers at 5, 7, 9 and 30 days after the nerve crush. The number of spindles as well as encapsulated fibers exceeded that of normal medial gastrocnemius muscles. The encapsulated fibers resembled typical intrafusal fibers. They had normal sensory-muscle contacts, but no motor endings. The fibers displayed equatorial clusters of myonuclei and expressed the spindle-specific slow-tonic myosin heavy chain isoform at postnatal day 30. Thus, efferents are not essential for the formation and differentiation of muscle spindles in reinnervated muscles of neonatal rats.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornMicroscopy, ElectronMuscle DenervationMusclesMuscle SpindlesNerve CrushNerve RegenerationNeurons, AfferentRatsRats, Sprague-Dawley

Identifiers

PMID1416079
OpenAlexW2049149330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.