Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1416078›Full record

ArticleAnatomy and embryology1992

The relationship between the number of nuclei of an osteoclast and its resorptive capability in vitro.

K Piper, A Boyde, S J Jones

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomy and embryology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Osteoclasts at Bone Remodeling: Order from Order.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

K PiperDepartment of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College London, U.K.
A Boyde
S J Jones

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between the number of nuclei in an osteoclast and its resorptive efficiency, as demonstrated by the size of the pit it can make in a mineralized tissue in 24 h in vitro. Osteoclasts released mechanically from prehatch chick long bones were cultured on dentine slices or on plastic dishes for periods of 6 or 24 h. The frequency distribution of the multinucleate tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive cells with different numbers of nuclei was determined: the mean number of nuclei per cell was 6.92, with a mode of 4.47% had 5 or fewer nuclei and only 11% more than 10 nuclei. The pits associated with 292 osteoclasts with known numbers of nuclei were measured using a confocal laser light microscope (Lasertec) and dedicated image analysis system, and depths, plan areas and volumes determined. There was a positive correlation between the number of nuclei per osteoclast and the volume of the pit made, but a trend for the volume resorbed per nucleus to decrease with increase in the number of nuclei per osteoclast.

Indexed as

Bone ResorptionAnimalsCell CountCell NucleusChick EmbryoOsteoclasts

Identifiers

PMID1416078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.