ReviewSozial- und Praventivmedizin1992
[Restrictions to smoking at the workplace and smoking habits: a literature review].
Review in Sozial- und Praventivmedizin, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smoking patterns and mortality attributable to smoking in a cohort of 3528 construction workers.European journal of epidemiology · 1996Article
- [Impact of smoking regulations in the workplace].Sozial- und Praventivmedizin · 1993Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on a critical review of the literature, we assess the consequences of restrictive smoking policies at the worksite on smoking habits of active smokers. The majority of the fourteen studies reported to date (eleven studies from the United States, one study from Canada, one from Australia and one from the FRG) suggest that restrictive smoking policies might have a major impact on reduction of cigarette smoking and eventual smoking cessation of active smokers. However, most of the studies suffer from serious methodologic limitations, and more stringent scientific investigations should be carried out. Nevertheless, implementation of restrictive smoking policies at the worksite appears to be a reasonable measure of nonsmoker protection, even before definitive evaluation of the impact on smoking behavior of active smokers. Such implementation should take place without discrimination of smokers in the context of comprehensive worksite prevention programs and should be accompanied by thorough scientific evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
1414017What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.