ArticleImmunology1992
Production of rheumatoid factor in adoptively immune guinea-pigs after challenge with Treponema pallidum.
Article in Immunology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The guinea pig as a model of infectious diseases.Comparative medicine · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Guinea-pigs of inbred strains 2 and C4D were infused with various concentrations (1 x 10(8) to 4 x 10(8) of syngeneic nylon wool-purified Treponema pallidum-immune T lymphocytes (TPI-T) and challenged 24 hr later with virulent T. pallidum (10(8) organisms). The degree of protection depended on the number of infused T cells and was associated with an accelerated production of IgM rheumatoid factor (RF). Fully protected animals (4 x 10(8) TPI-T) did not produce treponemal antibodies or circulating immune complexes (CIC) but produced IgM RF detectable 10 days after infection. Partially protected animals (< or = 2 x 10(8) TPI-T) produced, 30 days post-infection, relatively low levels of treponemal antibodies but high levels of CIC and RF. Control animals infused with 2 x 10(8) TPI-T lymphocytes but not infected with T. pallidum, when monitored for a period of 6 weeks, did not produce treponemal antibodies, CIC, or RF, excluding the possibility that IgM RF could be generated by the donor's B cells contaminating (circa 3%) the TPI-T lymphocytes. Moreover, unprotected syngeneic control animals infused, prior to infection, with T. phagedenis biotype Reiter-immune T cells or with T. pallidum-free testicular inflammatory fluid-immune T cells responded with increasing levels of treponemal antibodies; only a few animals produced RF and CIC 5 months after infection similarly to control guinea-pigs infected only. The production of RF in partially protected animals responding to infection with treponemal antibodies and CIC was apparently associated with the presence of the CIC; but the mechanism of RF production in fully protected animals in which no antibodies or CIC were detected is currently unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
1398746PMC1421557W101937836What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.