Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1386425›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research1992

A new strategy useful for rapid identification of microsatellites from DNA libraries with large size inserts.

B Baron, C Poirier, D Simon-Chazottes, C Barnier, J L Guénet

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Exploiting dinucleotide microsatellites conserved among mammalian species.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 1996
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mouse chromosome 19.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 1992
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B BaronUnité de Génétique des Mammifères, l'Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
C Poirier
D Simon-Chazottes
C Barnier
J L Guénet
Institut Pasteur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsatellites are new powerful polymorphic markers used for gene mapping. Their characterization requires that all the sequence surrounding the repeat be known in order to be able to design primers for PCR amplification. However, when using DNA libraries with large cloned inserts, this sequence characterization is not immediately practicable. In this paper, we describe a new strategy, based both on the use of a microsatellite specific probing and on the creation of nested deleted clones with the Exonuclease III, in order to position microsatellites in a range allowing direct sequencing. This method was applied to the screening of a mouse chromosome 19 DNA specific library. In this way, thirteen clones were identified by specific probing and seven were submitted to the nested deletion strategy. Five of them presented microsatellite sequences in specific deleted subclones which were selected and sequenced. Primers were designed for each of them and polymorphism between the genomes of several inbred strain of mouse have been determined. These microsatellites were mapped, three of them to chromosome 19 and two to chromosome 11.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriophage lambdaBase SequenceCloning, MolecularGene LibraryGenetic MarkersGenetic TestingMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMolecular Sequence DataOligodeoxyribonucleotidesPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, GeneticRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidGenetic MarkersOligodeoxyribonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID1386425
PMCPMC334016
OpenAlexW2097323369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.