Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1384996›Full record

ArticleCurrent genetics1992

RNA editing in the mitochondria of a conifer.

J C Glaubitz, J E Carlson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current genetics, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. RNA editing in plant organelles: a fertile field.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1996
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evidence for RNA editing in mitochondria of all major groups of land plants except the Bryophyta.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1994
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Taxonomic and population differentiation of mitochondrial diversity inPinus banksiana andPinus conforta.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 1993
    Article
  13. High levels of population differentiation for mitochondrial DNA haplotypes inPinus radiata, muricata, andattenuata.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 1993
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J C GlaubitzBiotechnology Laboratory, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
J E Carlson
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 712-base portion of the mitochondrial gene coxI and the corresponding portion of the coxI transcript were amplified by PCR and by RT-PCR, respectively, from the gymnosperm western red cedar. Sequence comparison of amplified coxI DNA and mRNA revealed 26 C-to-U differences that are best explained by RNA editing of the type known to occur in angiosperms. This finding suggests that mitochondrial RNA-editing of the C-to-U type arose before the divergence of gymnosperms and angiosperms and can be considered a feature common to all higher plants.

Indexed as

RNA EditingAmino Acid SequenceBase SequenceDNA, MitochondrialElectron Transport Complex IVGenes, PlantMolecular Sequence DataPlant ProteinsPolymerase Chain ReactionRNATreesDNA, MitochondrialElectron Transport Complex IVPlant ProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID1384996
OpenAlexW2074751369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.