Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1378342›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1992

Alpha 4-2 beta 2 and other nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes as targets of psychoactive and addictive drugs.

J Connolly, J Boulter, S F Heinemann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Valium without dependence? Individual GABANeuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Potential therapeutic uses of mecamylamine and its stereoisomers.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2013
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J ConnollyMolecular Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute, San Diego, CA 92138.
J Boulter
S F Heinemann
Salk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

SYNAPSE FORMATION AND NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASER01NS011549 · NINDS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI HEINEMANN, STEPHEN FOX · 1985 to 1997
–
NINDS NIH HHS NS11549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. Xenopus oocytes were injected with various muscle and neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (ACh receptor, cholinoceptor) subunit RNA combinations and their pharmacological properties studied using two-electrode voltage clamp. The functional expression of one of these combinations, rat alpha 4-2 beta 2, has not been previously described. The alpha 4-2 mRNA is a splicing variant transcribed from the alpha 4 gene. In the experiments reported here, the alpha 4-2 beta 2 subtype was functionally indistinguishable from the alpha 4-1 beta 2 subtype. 2. For each subtype, the relative potency of nicotine compared with acetylcholine was obtained by estimating the relative concentration of nicotine which would elicit the same current response as 0.1 microM Ach. The ratios of these concentrations (nicotine: ACh) for the mouse muscle ACh receptor-(alpha 1 beta 1 gamma delta) was 96.1:1. In contrast, the ratios for the rat neuronal subtypes were: alpha 2 beta 2, 1.01:1; alpha 3 beta 2, 2.01:1; alpha 4 beta 2, 0.76:1 and alpha 4-2 beta 2, 0.76:1. The much greater relative nicotine sensitivity of the neuronal subtypes as compared with muscle receptors illustrates their potential to mediate the psychoactive and addictive effects of nicotine. However, it does not appear that the differences in relative nicotinic sensitivity among the neuronal receptors themselves can be used as a simple discriminative tool in neuronal tissue. 3. The slopes of the log dose-log response curves at low ACh concentrations were all greater than 1 but less than 2, suggesting that at least two agonist binding sites mediate the functional response of each hetero-oligomer. 4. The response of all the neuronal subtypes to ACh could be inhibited by the psychoactive drugs mecamylamine, amitriptyline, phencyclidine, trifluoperazine and promethazine. With the exception of the very potent antagonist, mecamylamine, the degree of block of the peak current to ACh produced by 10 microM concentrations of these drugs was remarkably similar (around 50%). 5. The degree of inhibition produced when the antipsychotic drug, trifluoperazine, was co-applied with ACh increased as the duration of application increased. Such an effect was not observed with promethazine, a related phenothiazine derivative which does not have antipsychotic actions.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAnimalsCloning, MolecularDNANeuronsNicotineOocytesPromethazinePsychotropic DrugsReceptors, NicotinicRNASubstance-Related DisordersTrifluoperazineXenopusAcetylcholineDNANicotinePromethazinePsychotropic DrugsReceptors, NicotinicRNATrifluoperazine

Identifiers

PMID1378342
PMCPMC1908465
OpenAlexW129138400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.