Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1372857›Full record

ReviewDrugs1992

Vasodilators. A re-evaluation of their role in heart failure.

L W Stevenson, G Fonarow

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L W StevensonAhmanson-UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
G Fonarow
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 25 years, the concept of circulation in heart failure has evolved from that of a simple circuit with a weak pump and high pressures to a complex integrated system of cellular modification, cardiac compensation and systemic neurohumoral responses. The original model of cardiac afterload as the systemic vascular resistance has been refined to reflect the interdependence of preload and afterload and the central role of atrioventricular valve regurgitation. It is becoming increasingly apparent that the impact of vasodilator therapy far exceeds the direct haemodynamic effects on preload and afterload, and depends on the mechanism by which vasodilation is achieved, with increasing emphasis on those agents which oppose neurohumoral activation. The potential goals of therapy have broadened to include not only haemodynamic stabilisation through tailored therapy for patients referred with advanced heart failure, but also the prevention of disease progression for patients with asymptomatic ventricular dilation. As the different profiles of heart failure have come to be recognised, the purpose and design of vasodilator treatment must now be considered individually for each patient.

Indexed as

Cardiac Output, LowHeart FailureHemodynamicsHumansPhysical ExertionVasodilationVasodilator AgentsVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID1372857
OpenAlexW2027485200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.