Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1371520›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1992

Evidence for two serotype G3 subtypes among equine rotaviruses.

G F Browning, R M Chalmers, T A Fitzgerald, D R Snodgrass

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Equine rotavirus infection.Journal of equine science · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Molecular characterization of equine rotavirus in Ireland.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2008
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Rotaviral diarrhea.The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice · 1993
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G F BrowningMoredun Research Institute, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
R M Chalmers
T A Fitzgerald
D R Snodgrass
Moredun Research Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ten cultivable equine rotavirus isolates, two of North American, six of British, and two of Irish origin, were compared with standard rotavirus strains and with each other by cross neutralization, neutralization with a panel of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), hybridization to a simian rotavirus (SA-11) VP7 gene probe, and reaction with rotavirus subgrouping and serotyping MAbs in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Six isolates, two of which had previously been serotyped as G3 by other workers, were found to be serotype G3; one was confirmed to be G5, and three were not related to serotypes G1 to G10. The serotype G3 strains were divisible into two subtypes, G3A and G3B, on the basis of cross neutralization. This division was also apparent in reactions with neutralizing VP7-specific MAbs and in the liquid hybridization assay. Two of the isolates were not bound by either subgroup MAb, six were bound by both subgroup I and II MAbs, and two were bound by only the subgroup I MAb. The assays used in this characterization provide a range of epidemiological information for use in future field investigations.

Indexed as

Capsid ProteinsAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, ViralCapsidEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEpidemiologic MethodsEpitopesHorse DiseasesHorsesNeutralization TestsRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsSerotypingAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, ViralCapsid ProteinsEpitopesVP7 protein, Rotavirus

Identifiers

PMID1371520
PMCPMC265082
OpenAlexW1734925455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.