Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1368400›Full record

ArticleCytotechnology1992

Effect of purine supplementation on the growth of salmonid cell lines in different mammalian sera.

R C Ganassin, N C Bols

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cytotechnology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Improve your success with fish cell lines-small things that matter.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R C GanassinDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
N C Bols
University of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Chinook salmon embryo cell line, CHSE-214, grew well in fetal bovine serum (FBS) but poorly in dialyzed (d) FBS. Purines restored most but not all growth-promoting activity to dFBS, which suggests that purines account for a large portion of the dialyzable fraction's growth-promoting activity. CHSE-214 died in newborn calf serum (NCS) but grew slightly in dNCS, which suggests that the dialyzable fraction of NCS contains a toxic component(s). Little or no proliferation occurred in calf serum (CS); some took place in horse serum (HS). Porcine serum (PS) was very toxic. In all these sera except PS and HS, the purine nucleoside, inosine, significantly enhanced growth, whereas the pyrimidine nucleoside, uridine, was without effect. The other purines, hypoxanthine, adenine, adenosine and guanosine also stimulated proliferation but not as well as inosine. Inosine also enhanced the growth of the rainbow trout gonadal cell line, RTG-2. Although their morphology underwent minor alterations in medium with inosine, CHSE-214 cells could be grown indefinitely in CS and inosine as effectively as in the more expensive FBS.

Indexed as

AnimalsBloodCattleCell DivisionCell LineCulture MediaHorsesInosineKineticsPurinesSalmonSwineCulture MediaInosinePurines

Identifiers

PMID1368400
OpenAlexW2008800888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.