Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1368116›Full record

ReviewCytotechnology1991

Explant organ culture: a review.

J H Resau, K Sakamoto, J R Cottrell, E A Hudson, S J Meltzer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cytotechnology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Intestinal Explant Cultures from Gilthead Seabream (International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Development and evaluation of a porcine in vitro colon organ culture technique.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J H ResauDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore 21201.
K Sakamoto
J R Cottrell
E A Hudson
S J Meltzer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organ explant culture models offer several significant advantages for studies of patho-physiologic mechanisms like cell injury, secretion, differentiation and structure development. Organs or small explants/slices can be removed in vivo and maintained in vitro for extended periods of time if careful attention is paid to the media composition, substrate selection, and atmosphere. In the case of human tissues obtained from autopsy or surgery, additional attention must be paid to the postmortem interval, temperature, hydration, and cause of death. Explant organ culture has been effectively utilized to establish outgrowth cell cultures and characterize the histiotypic relationships between the various cell types within an organ or tissue.

Indexed as

Organ Culture TechniquesAnimalsCulture TechniquesHumans

Identifiers

PMID1368116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.