ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2004
Sensitivity and reproducibility of accelerometry and heart rate in physical strain assessment during prosthetic gait.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Metabolic costs of activities of daily living in persons with a lower limb amputation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Physical Function and Pre-Amputation Characteristics Explain Daily Step Count after Dysvascular Amputation.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2019Article
- To total amount of activity….. and beyond: perspectives on measuring physical behavior.Frontiers in psychology · 2013Article
- Gait symmetry and regularity in transfemoral amputees assessed by trunk accelerations.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accelerometry and heart rate (HR) are frequently used indicators of physical strain during normal daily life. The present study focused on the sensitivity and reproducibility of accelerometry (body motility, the intensity of body movement measured with accelerometry) and HR (percentage maximal heart rate reserve, %HRR(max)) in the assessment of physical strain during walking in persons with a lower leg amputation, using persons without an amputation as reference. Ten patients with an amputation of the leg and ten comparison subjects performed, at an interval of 1 month, the same walking protocol three times. Subjects walked at a preferred speed and at fixed speeds. At their preferred walking speed, speed (0.63 vs 1.31 m s(-1), P=0.001), body motility [0.53 vs 0.91 (arbitrary unit), P=0.001] and %HRR(max) (42.5 vs 27.6, P=0.02) differed between the amputation group and the comparison group. At fixed walking speeds, only %HRR(max) differed between groups ( P</=0.002) and showed a session effect ( P=0.02). The relationship between body motility and %HRR(max) in the patient group was significantly different from that in the comparison group. It can be concluded that accelerometry is strongly related with walking speed, but not sensitive to differences and changes in economy, contrary to %HRR(max). The use of accelerometry as an indicator of the level of physical strain in persons with an amputation is not feasible. The added value of a calibration procedure has to be studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
13680239What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.