ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2003
Therapy strategies for multiple myeloma: current status.
Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and management of anaemia in haematologic cancer patients receiving cyclic nonplatinum chemotherapy: results of a prospective national chart survey.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2004Trial
- Bortezomib induces erythema multiforme-like cutaneous adverse effects: report of two cases.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2009Article
- Osteonecrosis of the jaws and bisphosphonate treatment in cancer patients.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by infiltration of bone marrow with a clone of neoplastic plasma cells. Impaired hematopoiesis and reduced production of functional immunoglobulins, as well as the induction of pathognomonic osteolytic lesions primarily contribute to the morbidity of patients with MM. Conventional chemotherapy is the treatment of choice for older patients, whereas those under 60 years benefit significantly from high-dose therapy followed by stem-cell rescue. The use of tandem transplantation, developed to further escalate the conditioning dose, has achieved additional improvement in survival. Interferon-alpha and glucocorticoids are effective as maintenance measures in MM but remain controversial because of their associated high costs and considerable toxicity. The resurrection of an old drug, thalidomide, for the therapy of MM and the development of potent immunomodulatory derivatives are highly promising new treatments that target MM cell-host interactions and the bone-marrow microenvironment, as well as the myeloma cell itself. The importance of the use of bisphosphonates for the prevention or amelioration of skeletal complications and hypercalcemia is well established. New generations of bisphosphonates show potent antitumor activity, again emphasising the importance of targeting the microenvironment of the plasma-cell clone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.