Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1355495›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology1992

Prognostic value of c-erbB-2 expression in uterine cervical carcinoma.

R J Hale, C H Buckley, H Fox, J Williams

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic abnormalities in invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma correlate with pattern of invasion: biologic and clinical implications.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. C-erbB-2 immunostaining: problems with interpretation.Journal of clinical pathology · 1994
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R J HaleDepartment of Reproductive Pathology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester.
C H Buckley
H Fox
J Williams
St. Mary’s Hospital · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo study the pattern of expression and prognostic importance of c-erbB-2 protein in cervical carcinoma.

methodsSixty two cases of stage IB/IIA cervical carcinoma, representing the three main tumour types, were investigated immunohistochemically for the presence of c-erbB-2 protein expression, using a monoclonal antibody (CB11) to its internal domain. Follow up of at least five years' duration was available in all cases.

resultsDefinite membrane staining was seen in 38.7% of cases. There was a strong correlation with poor survival (p less than 0.0001) particularly. For those with adenocarcinomas, this was the case when nodal metastases were present. In contrast, for squamous carcinomas and adenosquamous carcinomas, the association with a poor prognosis was most apparent in those patients without lymph node metastases.

conclusionsThese findings raise the possibility that immunostaining for c-erbB-2 protein could be used as a prognostic marker and may help identify those patients for whom early adjuvant treatment might be beneficial.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Squamous CellErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisPrognosisProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-OncogenesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins

Identifiers

PMID1355495
PMCPMC495185
OpenAlexW2006745678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.