Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology1992
Effect of cetirizine, ketotifen and chlorpheniramine on the dynamics of the cutaneous hypersensitivity reaction: a comparative study.
Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of longterm cetirizine treatment on the cutaneous hypersensitivity reaction in patients with grass pollen allergy.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 1994Trial
- Apoptosis of Eosinophil Granulocytes.Biology · 2020Review
- Biology of the eosinophil.Advances in immunology · 2009Review
- Second-generation antihistamines: actions and efficacy in the management of allergic disorders.Drugs · 2005Review
- Article
- Cetirizine/pseudoephedrine.Drugs · 2001Review
- Influence of histamine receptor antagonists on the dynamics of the cutaneous hypersensitivity reaction in patients infected with schistosoma haematobium.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 1993Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allergic cutaneous challenge causes mast cell and basophil mediator release which recruit inflammatory cells to the site of antigen administration. This secondary cell infiltration and mediator release is responsible for the changes seen during the late phase of allergic diseases. In this randomised, double-blind, cross-over, placebo controlled study, it was demonstrated that, at steady-state drug concentrations, chlorpheniramine reduced the wheal-and-flare reaction by about 50% compared to the 75% reduction, on average, by cetirizine and ketotifen. Cetirizine significantly reduced eosinophil vacuolisation at all observation periods, i.e. 2,6,10 and 24 h, and also inhibited basophil accumulation significantly at 10 h (75% reduction), while chlorpheniramine had a negligible effect on these variables. These changes would indicate that the late phase reaction was modified, especially as eosinophil vacuolisation is known to correlate with late phase intensity, T-lymphocyte infiltration and subsequent tissue damage. It further supports previous speculation that cetirizine inhibit late histamine release by acting on basophils. The extent of induration in the late phase reaction did not differ significantly among the three treatments. Cetirizine and ketotifen, noticeably although not significantly, reduced eosinophil and lymphocyte recruitment. As these two antihistamines differ structurally and in regard to receptor specificity, it is possible that they exert their actions on other, unspecified, receptors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.