ArticleHuman genetics1992
Estimating the stability of the proposed imprinted state of the fragile-X mutation when transmitted by females.
Article in Human genetics, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular analysis of mutations in the gene FMR-1 segregating in fragile X families.Human genetics · 1993Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fragile-X syndrome is a major cause of mental retardation in humans. The X-inactivation imprinting model accounts for the unusual pattern of inheritance and expression of this syndrome. According to this model, the fragile-X mutation creates a local block to the attempted reactivation of the mutant X chromosome prior to oogenesis. This local block results in an "imprinted" fragile-X chromosome that is deleterious in males and in females for whom this chromosome is predominantly the active X chromosome. The imprinted state of the fragile-X mutation is inferred to be stable when transmitted by an imprinted female because the penetrance of the syndrome in sons of affected females is estimated to be 1.0. To provide a more precise estimate of the stability of the proposed fragile-X imprint, we have analyzed published pedigrees that include restriction fragment length polymorphism and cytogenetic data from sibships with mothers who are interpreted as having an imprinted fragile-X allele. We conclude that the fragile-X imprint was stable in 46 out of 48 female meioses. This analysis leads to a preliminary estimate of about 96% for the stability of the imprint through female meiosis. Two imprinted females had progeny who appeared to be carriers of a nonimprinted fragile-X allele. If this interpretation is correct, then reversion from the imprinted to the nonimprinted state, or "erasure," can occasionally occur when the mutant fragile-X allele is transmitted by an imprinted female. We discuss the genetic and epigenetic significance of possible female erasure. We request DNA and cytogenetic information from unpublished pedigrees to quantify further the stability, during female meiosis, of the proposed imprinted state of the mutant fragile-X allele.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.