Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1327857›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection1992

Identification of human and bovine rotavirus serotypes by polymerase chain reaction.

K Taniguchi, F Wakasugi, Y Pongsuwanna, T Urasawa, S Ukae, S Chiba, S Urasawa

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Identification of a rotavirus G12 strain, Indonesia.Emerging infectious diseases · 2010
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

K TaniguchiDepartment of Hygiene, Sapporo Medical College, Japan.
F Wakasugi
Y Pongsuwanna
T Urasawa
S Ukae
S Chiba
S Urasawa
Sapporo Medical University · JPNational Institute of Health of Thailand · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for identifying serotypes of human and bovine rotaviruses was examined. In the identification of 115 human rotavirus samples in stools, results with PCR showed excellent agreement with results of serotyping by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using serotype-specific monoclonal antibodies. Furthermore, the PCR showed a much higher sensitivity (93%) than the ELISA test (82.6%). The PCR method could also be applied for identifying the serotype of bovine rotaviruses.

Indexed as

DNAPolymerase Chain ReactionAnimalsBase SequenceCattleEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansMolecular Sequence DataRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsSensitivity and SpecificitySerotypingDNA

Identifiers

PMID1327857
PMCPMC2271918
OpenAlexW2105038632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.