ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology1992
Potentiation of cardiodepressive action among calcium antagonists from different classes: evidence for a mechanism at the single calcium channel level.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beneficial effects of felodipine on myocardial and coronary function during low-flow ischemia and reperfusion.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 1996Article
- Quinidine-induced potentiation of cardiovascular effects of nitrendipine: functional aspects and possible molecular mechanisms.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 1995Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability of calcium antagonists and antiarrhythmic agents to potentiate the negative inotropic effects of calcium antagonists was investigated in guinea-pig left atria. The potency of nitrendipine was enhanced by several amphiphilic agents by one order of magnitude or more (by pretreatment with quinidine or bepridil). The effect of preincubation with bepridil was investigated for a larger number of dihydropyridines. Only some of them were potentiated like nitrendipine. There was no potentiation between any two members of the same chemical group, i.e. between two dihydropyridines or two catamphiphilic calcium antagonists. The interaction between bepridil and nitrendipine was studied in more detail. In atria, its extent was influenced by several conditions, such as the stimulus frequency, the incubation temperature, or the extracellular K+ concentration. In measurements of whole-cell calcium currents in guinea-pig myocytes, the interaction was found to take place in a quantitatively similar manner. At the single channel level, an enhancement of the effects could also be demonstrated. It appears here that both drugs interact by binding to the same channel molecule. We conclude that the interaction may be due to 1.: an amphiphilic drug (like bepridil) binding to the channel very transiently and thus briefly favouring the inactivated channel state, which means that 2.: the other drug (like nitrendipine) has a higher chance to be bound because of its high affinity towards inactivated channels. Alternative explanations are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.