ArticleArchives of virology1992
Analysis of the genetic diversity of genes 5 and 6 among group C rotaviruses using cDNA probes.
Article in Archives of virology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two partial cDNA clones of genes 5 (encoding the major inner capsid protein VP 6) and 6 (encoding a nonstructural protein) of the porcine group (Gp) C rotavirus (Cowden strain) were radiolabeled with 32P and used individually as probes in Northern and dot blot hybridization assays. The specificity of each probe was tested against genomic dsRNA from: (1) porcine Gp A, B, and C rotaviruses; (2) Gp C rotaviruses from different species; and (3) porcine Gp C rotavirus field strains with varying electropherotype patterns. Neither probe hybridized with ds RNA from the porcine Gp A and B strains under the stringency conditions employed in the study. However, the gene 5 probe hybridized with the corresponding gene from the homologous porcine and the heterologous human and bovine Gp C rotaviruses tested. The gene 6 probe hybridized with the corresponding gene from the homologous Cowden strain, but hybridized weakly with gene 6 from the human and bovine Gp C rotaviruses. Both probes recognized all six different porcine Gp C field strains, although with varying intensities. Our results demonstrate that the gene 5 and 6 probes used in this study are specific for Gp C rotaviruses. However, evidence for greater genetic variation in the gene 6 among porcine, bovine and human Gp C strains suggested that the gene 5 probe may prove more broadly reactive among Gp C strains from different species. cDNA probes used in our study should prove useful for the detection of Gp C rotaviruses in feces and facilitate epidemiologic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.