Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1323671›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology1992

Calcium current variation between acutely isolated adult rat dorsal root ganglion neurons of different size.

R S Scroggs, A P Fox

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 349 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Channels (Austin, Tex.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. IGF/IGF-1R signal pathway in pain: a promising therapeutic target.International journal of biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cdk5-Dependent Phosphorylation of CaThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ion Channels Involved in Tooth Pain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ablation of αProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R S ScroggsDepartment of Pharmacological and Physiological Sciences, University of Chicago, IL 60637.
A P Fox
Department of Physiological Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The distribution of pharmacologically and/or biophysically unique Ca2+ current subtypes was studied in different diameter rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neuron cell bodies. DRG cells which fell into three diameter ranges, small (20-27 microns), medium (33-38 microns) and large (45-51 microns), were studied. T-type Ca2+ current was defined as low-threshold, rapidly inactivating current evoked by a weak test depolarization (-50 mV) from negative holding potentials (-80 to -100 mV), and which was sensitive to changes in holding potential. L-type Ca2+ current was defined as peak high-threshold Ca2+ current evoked from a holding potential of -60 mV and sensitive to blockade by 2 microM-nimodipine. N-type Ca2+ current was defined as peak high-threshold Ca2+ current evoked from a holding potential of -60 mV and sensitive to blockade by 0.9 microM-omega-conotoxin GVIA. 2. T-type Ca2+ currents were observed in small and medium diameter, but not in large diameter, DRG cell bodies. Large diameter DRG cell bodies had a small amount of low-threshold Ca2+ current but this current did not inactivate and was insensitive to a change in holding potential from -80 to -90 mV, and thus did not appear to be conducted through T-type Ca2+ channels. The T-type Ca2+ currents observed in medium diameter DRG cell bodies were considerably larger in amplitude (1-6 nA) than those observed in small diameter DRG cell bodies (100 pA-1 nA). This difference could not be accounted for by the difference in membrane surface area of small versus medium diameter DRG cell bodies. 3. The T-type Ca2+ currents observed in medium diameter DRG cells were sensitive to blockade by amiloride. Amiloride (500 microM) blocked 79.4 +/- 0.9% (mean +/- S.E.M.) of T-type Ca2+ current amplitude in six medium diameter DRG cell bodies which were held at -80 mV and depolarized to -50 or -40 mV. Amiloride (500 microM) failed to block high-threshold current in five medium diameter DRG cell bodies, indicating that it was specific for T-type Ca2+ current in these cells. 4. The percentage of peak whole-cell L-type Ca2+ current was significantly larger in small diameter DRG cell bodies (52.9 +/- 4.7% of total whole-cell Ca2+ current) than in medium diameter DRG cell bodies (6.6 +/- 3.9% of total whole-cell Ca2+ current) or large diameter DRG cell bodies (19.4 +/- 5.7% of total whole-cell Ca2+ current).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAmilorideAnimalsCalciumCalcium ChannelsGanglia, SpinalMaleMollusk VenomsNeuronsNimodipineomega-Conotoxin GVIAPeptides, CyclicRatsAmilorideCalciumCalcium ChannelsMollusk VenomsNimodipineomega-Conotoxin GVIAPeptides, Cyclic

Identifiers

PMID1323671
PMCPMC1180002
OpenAlexW2006356077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.