Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1318392›Full record

ReviewJournal of virology1992

Common and unique features of T antigens encoded by the polyomavirus group.

J M Pipas

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of virology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 227 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Manipulation of the cell cycle by HIV-1.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

J M PipasDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

YEAST ER MOLECULAR CHAPERONE TRANSLOCATION: GENOME DATABANK HOMOLOGSP41RR006009 · NCRR · MELLON PITTS CORPORATION (MPC CORP) · PI KNOLL, ERIC · 1990 to 2011
$22.0M
SV40 T ANTIGEN--ROLE IN VIRUS GROWTH AND TRANSFORMATIONR01CA040586 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PIPAS, JAMES M · 1985 to 2010
$2.7M
GENETIC ANALYSIS OF THE SV40 LARGE TUMOR ANTIGENR37CA040586 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PIPAS, JAMES M · 1988 to 1995
–
NCI NIH HHS CA40586NCRR NIH HHS 1 P41 RR06009-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although 12 different members of the polyomavirus group have now been identified, only SV40 and PyV have been studied extensively. Whereas each member of the group shows a restricted host range, viruses infecting species from birds to humans have been reported. Although little is known concerning the biology of natural infections in the wild, it is apparent that these viruses exhibit various cell-type tropisms. Some viruses, such as LPV (B lymphocytes) or KV (pulmonary endothelium), are tightly restricted to specific cell types, while others, such as PyV, infect a variety of tissues in the animal. Despite these differences, all polyomaviruses share a common strategy of productive infection, expressing T antigens which act both on cellular targets, preparing cellular metabolism for supporting optimal viral replication, and then on targets within the viral genome, to regulate viral DNA replication, transcription, and assembly. Presumably, this common replication strategy restricts the degree to which the sequences of these viruses can diverge. Thus, sequence motifs conserved among these different viruses may indicate key structural elements essential for biochemical function. In this article I have compared the sequences of all polyomavirus-encoded large and small T antigens sequenced to date. This has led to the following conclusions and speculations. (i) Comparison of the domain organization of different large T antigens reveals that these proteins fall into two structural classes. Members of the SV40 class, which include SV40, JCV, BKV, and SA12, possess a carboxyl-terminal domain, which in SV40 has been shown to be dispensable for viral DNA replication but essential for virion assembly. The PyV class lacks the carboxyl-terminal domain and carries additional amino acids within the amino-terminal domain. When total amino acid identity is examined, members of the SV40 class show the highest degree of conservation (65 to 85%), while sequence identity among the remaining viruses varies from 18 to 55%. (ii) The DNA binding domains of most large T antigens are closely related, with amino acid identities ranging from 35 to 86%. Several residues within this domain are invariant among all T antigens. All of these viruses have multiple copies of the consensus T-antigen-binding pentanucleotide (GAGGC) in their ori region, suggesting that all T antigens recognize this sequence. The single exception is the large T antigen encoded by the avian virus BFDV. The putative DNA binding domain of this protein shows little or no sequence relation to that of other T antigens. Furthermore, the GAGGC motif is not found in the ori region of this virus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Indexed as

Antigens, Polyomavirus TransformingAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsHumansMolecular Sequence DataPolyomavirusStructure-Activity RelationshipAntigens, Polyomavirus Transforming

Identifiers

PMID1318392
PMCPMC241200
OpenAlexW1682025883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.