ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology1992
The effect of respiratory manoeuvres and pharmacological agents on the pharmacokinetics of nedocromil sodium after inhalation.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antihistamines in the treatment of asthma.Clinical reviews in allergy · 1994Review
- Nedocromil sodium. An updated review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in asthma.Drugs · 1993Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Eight healthy subjects inhaled nedocromil sodium from a metered-dose inhaler using a standardised inspiratory technique. Blood samples were taken for up to 270 min after inhalation for radioimmunoassay of plasma nedocromil sodium concentrations. 2. To investigate the possibility that respiratory manoeuvres can alter the absorption of the drug from the lungs, on the first (control) study day at 70 min after dosing, subjects performed nine forced expiratory manoeuvres over a 3 min period. At 110 min after dosing, subjects took a slow, full inspiration with a 30 s breath-hold, and at 150 min after dosing the subjects performed one single forced expiration. 3. On the second study day, subjects inhaled methoxamine, 0.15 mg kg-1 of a 20 mg ml-1 solution at 60 min after dosing, and the study continued as above. On the third day, subjects repeated the sequence of respiratory manoeuvres, after having taken phenoxymethyl penicillin and probenecid by mouth for 48 h. 4. Both multiple forced expirations and the deep inspiration with breath-hold produced significant increases in the absorption of nedocromil sodium. Inhaled methoxamine did not alter airway calibre or the response to the respiratory manoeuvres. Probenecid, but not penicillin, was detected in the subjects' plasma, and had the effect of increasing the rise in plasma nedocromil sodium concentrations after the multiple forced expirations when compared with the control day. 5. These data suggest that disruption of epithelial tight junctions induced by the respiratory manoeuvres leads to enhanced paracellular transport of nedocromil sodium into the draining circulation of the airways and alveoli.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.