Pulsatile signaling in intercellular communication. Periodic stimuli are more efficient than random or chaotic signals in a model based on receptor desensitization.

The efficiency of various patterns of pulsatile stimulation is determined in a model in which a receptor becomes desensitized in the presence of its stimulatory ligand. The effect of stochastic or chaotic changes in the duration and/or interval between successive pulses in a series of square-wave stimuli is investigated. Before addressing the effect of random variations in the pulsatile signal, we first extend the results of a previous analysis (Li, Y.X., and A. Goldbeter. 1989. Biophys. J. 55:125-145) by demonstrating the existence of an optimal periodic signal that maximizes target cell responsiveness whatever the magnitude of stimulation. As to the effect of stochastic or chaotic variations in the pulsatile stimulus, three kinds of random distributions are used, namely, a Gaussian and a white-noise distribution, and a chaotic time series generated by the logistic map. All these random distributions are symmetrically centered around the reference value of the duration or interval that characterizes the optimal periodic stimulus yielding maximal responsiveness in target cells. Stochastically or chaotically varying pulses are less effective than the periodic signal that corresponds to the optimal pattern of pulsatile stimulation. The response of the receptor system is most sensitive to changes in the time interval that separates successive stimuli. Similar conclusions hold when stochastic or chaotic signals are compared to a reference periodic stimulus differing from the optimal one, although the effect of random variations is then reduced. The decreased efficiency of stochastic pulses accounts for the observed superiority of periodic versus stochastic pulses of cyclic AMP (cAMP) in Dictyostelium amoebae. The results are also discussed with respect to the efficiency of periodic versus stochastic or chaotic patterns of hormone secretion.