Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1311335›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1992

Comparison of the benzoyl-DL-arginine-naphthylamide (BANA) test, DNA probes, and immunological reagents for ability to detect anaerobic periodontal infections due to Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Bacteroides forsythus.

W J Loesche, D E Lopatin, J Giordano, G Alcoforado, P Hujoel

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Evaluation of a Novel Immunochromatographic Device for DetectingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Red complex: Polymicrobial conglomerate in oral flora: A review.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2019
    Review
  10. Saliva diagnostics - Current views and directions.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Periodontal proteomics: wonders never cease!International journal of proteomics · 2013
    Review
  14. Halitosis: From diagnosis to management.Journal of natural science, biology, and medicine · 2013
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Oral fluid-based biomarkers of alveolar bone loss in periodontitis.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W J LoescheDepartment of Biological and Materials Sciences, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor 48109-1078.
D E Lopatin
J Giordano
G Alcoforado
P Hujoel
University of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most forms of periodontal disease are associated with the presence or overgrowth of anaerobic species that could include Treponema denticola, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Bacteroides forsythus among others. These three organisms are among the few cultivable plaque species that can hydrolyze the synthetic trypsin substrate benzoyl-DL-arginine-naphthylamide (BANA). In turn, BANA hydrolysis by the plaque can be associated with periodontal morbidity and with the presence of these three BANA-positive organisms in the plaque. In this investigation, the results of the BANA test, which simultaneously detects one or more of these organisms, were compared with the detection of these organisms by (i) highly specific antibodies to P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and B. forsythus; (ii) whole genomic DNA probes to P. gingivalis and T. denticola; and (iii) culturing or microscopic procedures. The BANA test, the DNA probes, and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or an indirect immunofluorescence assay procedure exhibited high sensitivities, i.e., 90 ot 96%, and high accuracies, i.e., 83 to 92%, in their ability to detect combinations of these organisms in over 200 subgingival plaque samples taken from the most periodontally diseased sites in 67 patients. This indicated that if P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and B. forsythus are appropriate marker organisms for an anaerobic periodontal infection, then the three detection methods are equally accurate in their ability to diagnose this infection. The same statement could not be made for the culturing approach, where accuracies of 50 to 62% were observed.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesBacteria, AnaerobicBacterial InfectionsBacteroidesBenzoylarginine-2-NaphthylamideDNA ProbesEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansImmunologic TechniquesIndicators and ReagentsPeriodontal DiseasesPorphyromonas gingivalisTreponemaBenzoylarginine-2-NaphthylamideDNA ProbesIndicators and Reagents

Identifiers

PMID1311335
PMCPMC265072
OpenAlexW1973997528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.