Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12975582›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2003

15N relaxation study of the cold shock protein CspB at various solvent viscosities.

Markus Zeeb, Maik H Jacob, Thomas Schindler, Jochen Balbach

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Markus ZeebLaboratorium für Biochemie, Universität Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany.
Maik H Jacob
Thomas Schindler
Jochen Balbach
University of Bayreuth · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For a detailed NMR study of the dynamics of the cold shock protein CspB from Bacillus subtilis, we determined (15)N transverse and longitudinal relaxation rates and heteronuclear nuclear Overhauser effects at different solvent viscosities. Up to a relative viscosity of 2, which is equivalent to 27% ethylene glycol (EG), the overall correlation time follows the linear Stokes-Einstein equation. At a relative viscosity of 6 (70% EG) the correlation time deviates from linearity by 30%, indicating that CspB tumbles at a higher rate as expected from the solvent viscosity probably due to a preferential binding of water molecules at the protein surface. The corresponding hydrodynamic radii, determined by NMR diffusion experiments, show no variation with viscosity. The amplitudes of intramolecular motions on a sub-nanosecond time scale revealed by an extended Lipari-Szabo analysis were mainly independent of the solvent viscosity. The lower limit of the NMR 'observation window' for the internal correlation time shifts above 0.5 ns at 70% EG, which is directly reflected in the experimentally derived internal correlation times. Chemical exchange contributions to the transverse relaxation rates derived from the Lipari-Szabo approach coincide with the experimentally determined values from the transverse (1)H-(15)N dipolar/(15)N chemical shift anisotropy relaxation interference. These contributions originate from fast protein folding reactions on a millisecond timescale, which get retarded at increased solvent viscosities.

Indexed as

BacillusBacterial ProteinsDeuterium Exchange MeasurementModels, MolecularNitrogen IsotopesNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularSolventsStatistics as TopicViscosityBacterial Proteinscold-shock protein CspB, BacteriaNitrogen IsotopesSolvents

Identifiers

PMID12975582
OpenAlexW384175983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.