ArticleAtencion primaria2003
[Perspective of patients on type-2 diabetes and their relationship with primary care health professionals: a qualitative study].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Understanding the impact of endometriosis on women's life: an integrative review of systematic reviews.BMC women's health · 2024Pooled it
- [Can we improve management and control of chronic diseases?].Atencion primaria · 2006Pooled it
- 'It just wasn't going to be heard': A mixed methods study to compare different ways of involving people with diabetes and health-care professionals in health intervention research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Trial
- Editorial: Public health challenges in post-Soviet countries during and beyond COVID-19.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Women's Health and Gynecology: Old Challenges and New Insights.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Direct and Indirect Costs Related to Physical Activity Levels in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus in Spain: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- What and how do different stakeholders contribute to intervention development? A mixed methods study.HRB open research · 2022Article
- Type 1 Diabetes Patient Experiences Before and After Transfer from a Paediatric to an Adult Hospital.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
- Patient-Reported Experience and Outcome Measures in People Living with Diabetes: A Scoping Review of Instruments.The patient · 2021Article
- Patient-reported outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus: patients' and primary care physicians' perspectives in the Spanish health care system.Patient preference and adherence · 2015Article
- Living with diabetes: quality of care and quality of life.Patient preference and adherence · 2011Article
- Using qualitative methods to inform the trade-off between content validity and consistency in utility assessment: the example of type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer's disease.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2010Review
- Expectations held by type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus patients and their relatives: the importance of facilitating the health-care process.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2007Article
- [Problems and solutions in health care for chronic diseases. A qualitative study with patients and doctors].Atencion primaria · 2006Article
- [Perceptions and expectations on primary health care: a new form of identifying improvements in the care system].Atencion primaria · 2005Article
- [Commentary: The challenge of patient information].Atencion primaria · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe objective of this study is to investigate the perception that people with type 2 diabetes have about the disease and about their relationship with the primary healthcare professionals.
designQualitative research, carried out between September-November 2000.
settingPrimary healthcare center Barrio del Pilar from Madrid.
participants15 persons with type 2 diabetes. Variables considered to design the profiles of the interviewed were: age, gender, educational level, and time since diagnosis.
methodStructural sampling and open interviews.
resultsPatients express having scarce information regarding the consequences of diabetes. As diabetes is symptom free represents a difficulty for being perceived as a severe disease. The most valued aspects of the relationship with health professionals are that they provide with clear and tailored information, build a trust context, support changes and take account their perspectives and living circumstances.
conclusionsIt is essential to recognize how patients understand and shape the disease. Information provided by professionals have to be tailored to patients necessities, and take place in a trusting environment. Decisions related with diabetes management have to be aligned with patients perspectives. Effective communication could be considered as a useful tool to encourage adherence and improve healthcare quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.