Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12974234›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2003

[Epidural analgesia during childbirth].

D Crass, J Friedrich

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Pain therapy during labour].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2017
    Review
  2. Review
  3. [A survey of labour pain management in Germany].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2008
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D CrassKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Operativen Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Augsburg.
J Friedrich

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidural analgesia is the most effective means of pain relief during labor and is considered to be the "gold standard". For sufficient epidural analgesia, a wide range of nerve-block has to cover the segments Th10 to S4. This article includes the pathophysiological background as well as aspects of risk information and informed consent. Practical issues such as the insertion of the epidural catheter, choice of medication and application modes are described. The influence of epidural analgesia on labor, instrumental delivery and rate of caesarean section is discussed.

Indexed as

Analgesia, EpiduralAnalgesia, ObstetricalAdultAnesthetics, LocalCesarean SectionFemaleHumansLabor, ObstetricNerve BlockPregnancyAnesthetics, Local

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.