Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12969929›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003

Managing change in the culture of general practice: qualitative case studies in primary care trusts.

Martin N Marshall, Russell Mannion, Elizabeth Nelson, Huw T O Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Collaborative improvement in Scottish GP clusters after the Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Leadership in rural medicine: the organization on thin ice?Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2011
    Article
  8. Evidence in the learning organization.Health research policy and systems · 2009
    Article
  9. Primary health care in New Zealand: the impact of organisational factors on teamwork.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Managing risk: a taxonomy of error in health policy.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2005
    Article
  14. Physicians' opinions on patients' requests for specific treatments and examinations.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2005
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martin N MarshallNational Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL. martin.marshall@man.ac.uk
Russell Mannion
Elizabeth Nelson
Huw T O Davies

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore the potential tension between the need for managers to produce measurable change and the skills required to produce cultural change, and to investigate how managers of primary care trusts are attempting to deal with this tension.

designQualitative case studies using data derived from semistructured interviews and a review of published documents. An established cultural framework was to used to help interpret the findings.

settingSix primary care trusts in England purposefully sampled to represent a range of cultural, structural, geographical, and demographic characteristics.

participants42 interviews with 39 different senior and middle primary care trust managers conducted over an 18 month period.

resultsWe found two distinct and polarised styles of management. One group of managers adopts a directive style and challenges the prevailing norms and values of clinicians, an approach characteristically seen in organisations with hierarchical cultures. This group is made up mostly of senior managers who are driven principally by the imperative to deliver a political agenda. Managers in the second group are more inclined to work with the prevailing cultures found in general practice, attempting to facilitate change from within rather than forcing change from outside. This management style is characteristically seen in organisations with a clan-type culture. The approach was manifest mostly by middle managers, who seem to act as buffers between the demands of senior managers and their own perception of the ability and willingness of health professionals to cope with change. The different management approaches can lead to tension and dysfunction between tiers of management.

conclusionsThe development of primary care depends on high quality managers who are able to draw on a range of different management skills and styles. Managers are most likely to be effective if they appreciate the merits and drawbacks of their different styles and are willing to work in partnership.

Indexed as

Organizational CultureOrganizational InnovationAdministrative PersonnelFamily PracticeHealth Services ResearchHumansInterprofessional RelationsOrganizational Case StudiesPractice Management, MedicalPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchState Medicine

Identifiers

PMID12969929
PMCPMC194091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.