Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12969508›Full record

ArticleBMC neuroscience2003

Evidence for cell autonomous AP1 function in regulation of Drosophila motor-neuron plasticity.

Subhabrata Sanyal, Radhakrishnan Narayanan, Christos Consoulas, Mani Ramaswami

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neuroscience, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Expression Pattern of the AB1-Gal4 Driver inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. JNK Signaling inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. SkpA restrains synaptic terminal growth during development and promotes axonal degeneration following injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dscam1 is required for normal dendrite growth and branching but not for dendritic spacing in Drosophila motoneurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  17. Retrograde BMP signaling at the synapse: a permissive signal for synapse maturation and activity-dependent plasticity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Subhabrata SanyalDepartment of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Box 210106 University of Arizona, 1007 E, Lowell Street, Tucson AZ 85721, USA. sanyal@u.arizona.edu
Radhakrishnan Narayanan
Christos Consoulas
Mani Ramaswami
University of Arizona · USNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

GENES INVOLVED IN LONG TERM NEURAL PLASTICITYR01DA013337 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI VETTER, MONICA L · 1999 to 2001
$817k
NIDA NIH HHS DA13337NINDS NIH HHS NS34489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transcription factor AP1 mediates long-term plasticity in vertebrate and invertebrate central nervous systems. Recent studies of activity-induced synaptic change indicate that AP1 can function upstream of CREB to regulate both CREB-dependent enhancement of synaptic strength as well as CREB-independent increase in bouton number at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction (NMJ). However, it is not clear from this study if AP1 functions autonomously in motor neurons to directly modulate plasticity.

resultsHere, we show that Fos and Jun, the two components of AP1, are abundantly expressed in motor neurons. We further combine immunohistochemical and electrophysiological analyses with use of a collection of enhancers that tightly restrict AP1 transgene expression within the nervous system to show that AP1 induction or inhibition in, but not outside of, motor neurons is necessary and sufficient for its modulation of NMJ size and strength.

conclusionBy arguing against the possibility that AP1 effects at the NMJ occur via a polysynaptic mechanism, these observations support a model in which AP1 directly modulates NMJ plasticity processes through a cell autonomous pathway in the motor neuron. The approach described here may serve as a useful experimental paradigm for analyzing cell autonomy of genes found to influence structure and function of Drosophila motor neurons.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, DifferentiationCholinergic FibersDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEvoked PotentialsFemaleGene Expression RegulationGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLarvaLuminescent ProteinsMaleModels, NeurologicalMotor NeuronsMusclesNeuromuscular JunctionAntigens, DifferentiationDrosophila ProteinsGreen Fluorescent Proteinskay protein, DrosophilaLuminescent ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-junTranscription Factor AP-1

Identifiers

PMID12969508
PMCPMC201019
OpenAlexW2117264193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.