Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12966408›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of cancer2003

The role of HER-2/neu expression on the survival of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

A-P Meert, B Martin, M Paesmans, T Berghmans, C Mascaux, J-M Verdebout, P Delmotte, J-J Lafitte, J-P Sculier

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic significance of preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Chemotherapeutic Activity of Imidazolium-Supported Pd(II)Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Primary Lung Cancer After Treatment for Breast Cancer.International journal of women's health · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Synthesis and anticancer activity of new quinazoline derivatives.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

A-P MeertFonds National de la Recherche Scientifique, Bruxelles, Belgium. ap.meert@bordet.be
B Martin
M Paesmans
T Berghmans
C Mascaux
J-M Verdebout
P Delmotte
J-J Lafitte
J-P Sculier
Institut Jules Bordet · BEFonds National de la Recherche · LUHôpital Albert Calmette · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

C-erbB-2 prognostic value for survival in patients with lung cancer remains controversial. We performed a systematic review of the literature to clarify its impact. Studies were identified by an electronic search in order to aggregate the survival results, after a methodological assessment using the scale of the European Lung Cancer Working Party. To be eligible, a study had to deal with c-erbB-2 assessment in lung cancer patients and to analyse survival according to c-erbB-2 expression. In total, 30 studies were eligible: 24 studies dealt with non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), five with adenocarcinoma and one study dealt with small-cell carcinoma. In all, 31% of the patients were positive for c-erbB-2. According to c-erbB-2 expression, 13 studies were 'negative' (significant detrimental effect on survival), one 'positive' (significant survival improvement) and 16 not significant. Significant studies had a better subscore relative to analysis and results report than nonsignificant studies. In total, 86% of the significant studies and only 56% of the nonsignificant studies were evaluable for the meta-analysis. This suggests a possible bias in our aggregated results. For NSCLC, the hazard ratio was 1.55 (95% CI: 1.29-1.86) in favour of tumours that do not express c-erbB-2. In conclusion, the overexpression of c-erbB-2 might be a factor of poor prognosis for survival in NSCLC, but there is a potential bias in favour of the significant studies with an overestimation risk of the magnitude of the true effect of c-erbB-2 overexpression.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Small CellErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesHumansLung NeoplasmsPrognosisSensitivity and SpecificitySurvival RateBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID12966408
PMCPMC2376951
OpenAlexW1970019155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.