Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12965923›Full record

ArticleClinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology2003

Clinical manifestations, epidemiology, and laboratory diagnosis of human monocytotropic ehrlichiosis in a commercial laboratory setting.

Juan P Olano, Wayne Hogrefe, Brent Seaton, David H Walker

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Microbes and Mental Illness: Past, Present, and Future.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An animal model of a newly emerging human ehrlichiosis.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2015
    Article
  8. Case report: Molecular evidence of Anaplasma platys infection in two women from Venezuela.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2014
    Article
  9. Non-lyme tick-borne diseases: a neurological perspective.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2013
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Human ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2010
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ehrlichia chaffeensis: a prevalent, life-threatening, emerging pathogen.Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association · 2004
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juan P OlanoDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Center for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Galveston, Texas 77555-0609, USA.
Wayne Hogrefe
Brent Seaton
David H Walker
Keysight Technologies (United States) · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS HR8-CCH613372-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory diagnostic issues of human monocytotropic ehrlichiosis (HME) were investigated in a retrospective case study conducted at a national reference laboratory (Focus Technologies, formerly MRL Reference Laboratory), and at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Texas, during 1997 and 1998. Standard questionnaires were sent to physicians for each laboratory-diagnosed patient 2 days to 2 weeks after immunofluorescent antibody assay results were available. Among the 41 cases for which data were obtained, 32 (78%) were definite cases of HME, and 9 (22%) were probable cases of HME. Tick bite or exposure to ticks was recorded in more than 97% of cases. The most prominent clinical findings were fever, abdominal tenderness, and regional lymphadenopathy. There was an association between age and severity of illness. The main laboratory findings included leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase. Clinical and laboratory findings were nonspecific and were not good predictors of the severity of illness. The 90% of patients who received doxycycline treatment underwent rapid clinical improvement with a favorable outcome. The usual duration of effective treatment with doxycycline was 7 to 10 days. This retrospective study is unique because it was based in a commercial reference laboratory setting that receives specimens from different geographic locations. The clinical and laboratory information from 41 patients provides insight into the epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of HME.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolEhrlichia chaffeensisEhrlichiosisFemaleHumansImmunoassayInfantLaboratoriesMaleMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionRetrospective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID12965923
PMCPMC193882
OpenAlexW2110508164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.