ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology1993
A survey of undergraduate and continuing medical education about antimicrobial chemotherapy in the United Kingdom. British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Working Party on Antimicrobial Use.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Change in the Perception of Oral Antibiotics Among Medical Students After Participating in a Parenteral-to-Oral Conversion Program for Highly Bioavailable Antibiotics.Open forum infectious diseases · 2022Article
- An Educational Game Evening for Medical Residents: A Proof of Concept to Evaluate the Impact on Learning of the Use of Games.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2021Article
- A review of antimicrobial stewardship training in medical education.International journal of medical education · 2017Review
- Mapping Antimicrobial Stewardship in Undergraduate Medical, Dental, Pharmacy, Nursing and Veterinary Education in the United Kingdom.PloS one · 2016Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1 A questionnaire about undergraduate teaching on antimicrobial chemotherapy was sent to academic Departments of Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacology and Medical Microbiology throughout the UK. 2 Questionnaires about postgraduate lectures and information circulated to doctors about antimicrobial chemotherapy were sent to Drug Information Centres and Postgraduate Tutors throughout the UK. Review articles and editorials in general medical journals were assessed. 3 The median amount of core undergraduate teaching on antimicrobial chemotherapy was 13.5 h but the range was from 9.0 h to 102.0 h. Content was predominantly oriented towards drugs rather than diseases and towards prescribing in hospital rather than in the community. Most teaching was by formal lecture as part of a core programme. On a scale from 0 to 5 the median emphasis given to individual topics ranged from 2.50 to 3.75 but the range of emphasis given by individual medical schools was wide, for example from 1.00 to 4.50 for teaching on pharmacokinetics. 4 Postgraduate tutors identified advice from local specialists and requests from local practitioners as the most important determinants of content of continuing medical education. Material from drug information centres was predominantly oriented towards discussion of individual drugs rather than management of specific diseases and even this limited survey found evidence of duplication. The UK general medical literature contained a total of 112 reviews or editorials on antimicrobial chemotherapy covering a wide range of topics but these were not, and should not be assumed to be comprehensive. 5 Almost all doctors regularly prescribe antimicrobials and require education about the subject. Wide variations in current medical practice should be addressed explicitly through more extensive use of problem solving. The literature suggests that knowledge is most effectively disseminated through local networks of practitioners. There should be more national co-ordination of the content of information to be disseminated through the existing drug information networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.