ArticleCNS drugs2003
Prevalence of and change in the prescription of methylphenidate in Israel over a 2-year period.
Article in CNS drugs, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The development and validation of the questionnaire My Experience with ADHD Pharmacotherapy - Parent Report (ME WAPH-P).European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Prevalence, diagnosis and treatment of ADHD in Arab and Jewish children in Israel, where are the gaps?BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Overdiagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Scoping Review.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Stimulant use for ADHD and relative age in class among children in Israel.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2016Article
- Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate: a new therapeutic option for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.CNS drugs · 2012Review
- Prevalence of methylphenidate use among Israeli children: 1998-2004.Clinical drug investigation · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe use of methylphenidate for the treatment of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has increased dramatically in the past decade in some countries in Europe and North America. In response to a public debate in Israel, several Knesset members introduced a legislative initiative that aims to limit the prescription of methylphenidate by physicians. The objective of this study was to examine the rate methylphenidate prescriptions dispensed for the treatment of ADHD in children in northern and central Israel in 1999 and 2001. PATIENTS AND STUDY
designThe population included all children aged 0-18 years living in central or northern Israel and insured by the largest national health management organisation who were prescribed methylphenidate at least once in 1999 or 2001. This was a population-based prevalence study comparing the two timepoints using data from the health management organisation and descriptive statistics.
resultsThe overall 1-year prevalence of methylphenidate prescriptions dispensed to children was 1.01% in 1999 and 1.22% in 2001 (relative risk [RR] 1.21, 95% CI 1.15-1.26), an increase of 21%. Seventy-seven percent of those prescribed methylphenidate were boys. The prescription rate ranged from 0.2% (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.76-2.05) in Arabic cities to 5.99% (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.30) in kibbutzim; this wide variation by type of residence apparently involved cultural, racial and economic factors.
conclusionIsrael shows no unusual or unexpected patterns in methylphenidate prescriptions dispensed to children and a lesser increase over time than other developed countries. This suggests that limiting physician freedom to prescribe methylphenidate to children may not be justified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12962530What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.