Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12962515›Full record

ReviewDrugs2003

Transdermal buprenorphine.

Hannah C Evans, Stephanie E Easthope

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Buprenorphine for treating cancer pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Pharmacokinetics and Paw Withdraw Pressure in Guinea Pigs (Cavia porcellus) Treated with Transdermal Buprenorphine.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Article
  5. Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Sustained-Release Buprenorphine Formulations in Owl Monkeys (Aotus spp.).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Review of Long-acting Parenteral Analgesics for Mice and Rats.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2022
    Review
  12. Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of Pre-emptive Use of Extended-release Buprenorphine for Mouse Laparotomy.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2022
    Article
  13. Pharmacokinetics of Single-Dose Intramuscular and Subcutaneous Injections of Buprenorphine in Common Marmosets (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Immunomodulation Associated with Sustained-release Buprenorphine in Female CD1 Mice Challenged with Ovalbumin.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluation of Analgesic Patches in Cynomolgus Macaques (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hannah C EvansAdis International Limited, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
Stephanie E Easthope

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Buprenorphine is a low molecular weight, lipophilic, opioid analgesic. Recently, a transdermal matrix patch formulation of buprenorphine has become available in three dosage strengths designed to release buprenorphine at 35, 52.5 and 70 micro g/h over a 72-hour period. At least satisfactory analgesia with minimal requirement for rescue medication (</=0.2 mg/day sublingual buprenorphine) was achieved by 34-50% of patients with chronic pain treated with transdermal buprenorphine 35, 52.5 or 70 micro g/h and 31% of placebo recipients, in one double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. In one trial involving patients unsuccessfully treated with weak opioids or morphine, 36.6% and 47.5% of buprenorphine 35 micro g/h and 52.5 micro g/h recipients, respectively, experienced at least satisfactory analgesia and received </=0.2 mg/day of sublingual buprenorphine compared with 16.2% of placebo recipients (both p </= 0.032). The requirement for rescue medication was reduced from baseline in >50% of patients treated with transdermal buprenorphine, in two trials. Furthermore, despite the availability of rescue medication to all patients, those receiving transdermal buprenorphine tended to experience greater pain relief, reduced pain intensity and longer pain-free sleep. Transdermal buprenorphine was generally well tolerated. Systemic adverse events were typical of opioid treatment or were attributable to the underlying disease.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineClinical Trials as TopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansIntractable PainPainAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphine

Identifiers

PMID12962515
OpenAlexW4250701005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.