Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12962275›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of membrane biology2003

Phagosome maturation: a few bugs in the system.

C C Scott, R J Botelho, S Grinstein

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of membrane biology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Regulation of Macrophage Foam Cell Formation During Nitrogen Mustard (NM)-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis by Lung Lipids.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Persistent bacterial infections and persister cells.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Structure of the virulence-associated protein VapD from the intracellular pathogen Rhodococcus equi.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography · 2014
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C C ScottProgramme in Cell Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
R J Botelho
S Grinstein

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells of the innate immune system ingest and destroy invading microorganisms by initially engulfing them into a specialized vacuole, known as the phagosome. The membrane of the forming phagosome is similar to the plasmalemma and its contents resemble the extracellular milieu. As such, the nascent phagosome is not competent to kill and eliminate the ingested microorganisms. However, shortly after sealing, the phagosome undergoes a series of rapid and extensive changes in its composition, the result of a sophisticated sequence of membrane fusion and fission reactions. Understanding the molecular basis of these events is of particular importance, since they are often the target of disruption by intracellular parasites such as Mycobacterium, Salmonella and Legionella. The objective of this review is to summarize the current knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying phagosomal maturation and its subversion by parasitic microorganisms.

Indexed as

Vesicular Transport ProteinsBacteriaEndocytosisMembrane FusionMembrane ProteinsPhagocytosisPhagosomesPhosphatidylinositolsSignal TransductionSNARE ProteinsStructure-Activity RelationshipMembrane ProteinsPhosphatidylinositolsSNARE ProteinsVesicular Transport Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.