ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2003
Biomarkers, validation and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of a flow cytometry based chemokine internalization assay for use in evaluating the pharmacodynamic response to a receptor antagonist.Journal of translational medicine · 2008Trial
- Tutorial on Causal Mediation Analysis for Pharmacometricians.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Recent advances in mass spectrometry-based bioanalytical methods for endogenous biomarkers analysis in transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Review
- Use of a PK/PD Model to Select Cetagliptin Dosages for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Phase 3 Trials.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2024Article
- Drug Development for New Psychiatric Drug Therapies.Advances in neurobiology · 2023Article
- Existing and novel biomarkers for precision medicine in systemic sclerosis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2018Review
- Useful pharmacodynamic endpoints in children: selection, measurement, and next steps.Pediatric research · 2018Review
- Modelling of the cancer cell cycle as a tool for rational drug development: A systems pharmacology approach to cyclotherapy.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- MicroRNA signatures as biomarkers and therapeutic target for CNS embryonal tumors: the pros and the cons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014Review
- Breath volatile organic compounds for the gut-fatty liver axis: promise, peril, and path forward.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the inhibitory effects of naproxen on the time-courses of inflammatory pain, fever, and the ex vivo synthesis of TXB2 and PGE2 in rats.Pharmaceutical research · 2011Article
- Literature mining for the discovery of hidden connections between drugs, genes and diseases.PLoS computational biology · 2010Article
- "Fit-for-purpose" method validation and application of a biomarker (C-terminal telopeptides of type 1 collagen) in denosumab clinical studies.The AAPS journal · 2009Article
- Sperm chromatin: fertile grounds for proteomic discovery of clinical tools.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2008Review
- Nanovehicular intracellular delivery systems.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2008Review
- Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of fluvoxamine 5-HT transporter occupancy in rat frontal cortex.British journal of pharmacology · 2008Article
- Development of translational pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2008Review
- Pharmacokinetic modeling of non-linear brain distribution of fluvoxamine in the rat.Pharmaceutical research · 2008Article
- Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling in diabetes mellitus.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2008Review
- Integrated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in drug development.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Four elements are crucial to successful pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling and simulation for efficient and effective rational drug development: (i) mechanism-based biomarker selection and correlation to clinical endpoints; (ii) quantification of drug and/or metabolites in biological fluids under good laboratory practices (GLP); (iii) GLP-like biomarker method validation and measurements and; (iv) mechanism-based PK/PD modelling and validation. Biomarkers can provide great predictive value in early drug development if they reflect the mechanism of action for the intervention even if they do not become surrogate endpoints. PK/PD modelling and simulation can play a critical role in this process. Data from genomic and proteomics differentiating healthy versus disease states lead to biomarker discovery and identification. Multiple genes control complex diseases via hosts of gene products in biometabolic pathways and cell/organ signal transduction. Pilot exploratory studies should be conducted to identify pivotal biomarkers to be used for predictive clinical assessment of disease progression and the effect of drug intervention. Most biomarkers are endogenous macromolecules, which could be measured in biological fluids. Many exist in heterogeneous forms with varying activity and immunoreactivity, posting challenges for bioanalysis. Reliable and selective assays could be validated under a GLP-like environment for quantitative methods. While the need for consistent reference standards and quality control monitoring during sample analysis for biomarker assays are similar to that of drug molecules, many biomarkers have special requirements for sample collection that demand a well coordinated team management. Bioanalytical methods should be validated to meet study objectives at various drug development stages, and possess adequate performance to quantify biochemical responses specific to the target disease progression and drug intervention. Protocol design to produce sufficient data for PK/PD modelling would be more complex than that of PK. Knowledge of mechanism from discovery and preclinical studies are helpful for planning clinical study designs in cascade, sequential, crossover or replicate mode. The appropriate combination of biomarker identification and selection, bioanalytical methods development and validation for drugs and biomarkers, and mechanism-based PK/PD models for fitting data and predicting future clinical endpoints/outcomes provide powerful insights and guidance for effective and efficient rational drug development, toward safe and efficacious medicine for individual patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.