Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12958275›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003

Comparing first-void urine specimens, self-collected vaginal swabs, and endocervical specimens to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by a nucleic acid amplification test.

Mary-Ann Shafer, Jeanne Moncada, Cherrie B Boyer, Kelli Betsinger, Scott D Flinn, Julius Schachter

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01234103 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Preventing Health Damaging Behaviors in Male and Female Army Recruits

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnited States Department of DefenseRan2010 to 2013Enrolled933ConditionsSexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Prevention, Unintended Pregnancy Prevention, Sexual Risk Reduction, Alcohol and Other Substance Use PreventionArmsPreventing Helath Damaging Health Behaviors in Male and Female Army Recruits
NCT01849653 completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Self-Obtained Vaginal Swabs for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Testing: Concurrence in Non-Clinical Settings vs. Clinical Settings

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2014 to 2015Enrolled3,500ConditionsChlamydial Infection, Gonococcal Infection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Recommendations for the laboratory-based detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae--2014.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2014
    Article
  18. Journal of clinical outcomes management : JCOM · 2014
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mary-Ann ShaferDivision of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco 94143, USA. shafer@itsa.ucsf.edu
Jeanne Moncada
Cherrie B Boyer
Kelli Betsinger
Scott D Flinn
Julius Schachter

Funding

PHS HHS MCH000978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We set out to determine the prevalences of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by ligase chain reaction as well as to determine the prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis by culture in a large and diverse national sample of non-health-care-seeking young women entering the military; we also sought to compare the abilities of three different techniques of collecting specimens (first-void urine, self-collected vaginal swab, and clinician-collected endocervical swab) to identify a positive specimen. A cross-sectional sample of young women was voluntarily recruited; as a part of their routine entry pelvic examination visit, they completed a self-administered reproductive health questionnaire and provided first-void urine (used to detect C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae) and self-collected vaginal swabs (used to detect C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, and T. vaginalis). The number of positive tests divided by the number of sexually active women screened by each sampling method determined the rates of prevalence. The rate of infection with any of the three sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) tested was 14.1%. The total positive rates for each STD (identified by >/=1 specimen) were the following: for C. trachomatis, 11.6%; N. gonorrhoeae, 2.4%; and T. vaginalis, 1.7%. The proportions of positives identified by specimen type were, for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae, respectively, endocervix, 65 and 40%; urine, 72 and 24%; and vagina, 81 and 72%. The proportions of positives when specimen results were combined were, for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae, respectively, cervix plus urine, 86 and 49%; cervix plus vagina, 91 and 93%; and vagina plus urine, 94 and 79%. We concluded that STDs were epidemic in this population. Self-collected vaginal swabs identified the highest number of positive test results among single specimens, with the combined cervix-vagina results identifying the highest number of positive results. Self-collected vaginal swab collections are a feasible alternative to cervical specimen collections in this population, and the use of multiple types of specimens increases the positive yield markedly.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBacteriuriaCervix UteriChlamydia trachomatisFemaleHumansNeisseria gonorrhoeaeNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesSexually Transmitted DiseasesVagina

Identifiers

PMID12958275
PMCPMC193832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.