ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003
Molecular typing of, and distribution of genetic markers among, Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates from Brazil.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Burkholderia cepacia complex in cystic fibrosis in a Brazilian reference center.Medical microbiology and immunology · 2017Article
- SNaPBceBcon: a Practical Tool for Identification and Genotyping of Burkholderia cepacia and Burkholderia contaminans.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
- Genetic diversity of Burkholderia contaminans isolates from cystic fibrosis patients in Argentina.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2013Article
- Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for rapid identification of nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria isolated from sputum samples from cystic fibrosis patients.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2008Article
- Prevalence of indeterminate genetic species of Burkholderia cepacia complex in a cystic fibrosis center in Argentina.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2008Article
- Expression of the bviIR and cepIR quorum-sensing systems of Burkholderia vietnamiensis.Journal of bacteriology · 2007Article
- Distribution of Burkholderia cepacia complex species among isolates recovered from persons with or without cystic fibrosis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PCR tests were used to assign genomovar status to 39 non-cystic fibrosis (non-CF) and 11 CF Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates from patients in hospitals in Recife, Brazil. Non-CF isolates were assigned to genomovar IIIA (71.8%), genomovar I (15.4%), B. vietnamiensis (7.7%), and B. multivorans (5.1%). CF isolates were assigned to genomovar IIIA (18.2%), B. vietnamiensis (18.2%), and genomovar I (9.1%). Six CF isolates sharing recA PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) patterns could not be assigned to a genomovar. 16S rDNA sequence obtained from these isolates indicated a closest relationship to B. anthina, but the recA sequence was equally divergent from several genomovars. PCR screening indicated the presence of cblA in only two isolates, whereas the B. cepacia epidemic strain marker was found in 22 of 28 genomovar IIIA isolates. A type III secretion gene was detected in all but genomovar I isolates. RAPD and PCR-RFLP assays, targeting both recA and fliC, indicated a large amount of genetic variability among the isolates, with many novel patterns being observed. Nine genomovar IIIA isolates from different non-CF patients and clinical sources had identical genotypes, indicating the presence of a common clone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.