Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12958114›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003

Screening in brief intervention trials targeting excessive drinkers in general practice: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anders Beich, Thorkil Thorsen, Stephen Rollnick

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 73 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01573416 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

"Effectiveness of a Brief Intervention for Substances Consumption Linked to the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): A Randomized Control Trial in Chilean Primary Care."

TypeinterventionalSponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRan2011 to 2013Enrolled400ConditionsAlcohol-Related Disorders, Substance-Related Disorders, Substance AbuseArmsASSIST-linked brief intervention for hazardous and harmful substance use., Observation
NCT02420561 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Motivational Interviewing to Reduce Substance Use Among Depression Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2010 to 2014Enrolled307ConditionsDepression, Substance-Related DisordersArmsMotivational Interviewing, Control (brochure)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Accuracy of one or two simple questions to identify alcohol-use disorder in primary care: a meta-analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Alcohol misuse.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Alcohol misuse.BMJ clinical evidence · 2009
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anders BeichCentral Research Unit and Department of General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Panum Institute, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark. a.beich@gpract.ku.dk
Thorkil Thorsen
Stephen Rollnick

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the effectiveness of programmes of screening in general practice for excessive alcohol use and providing brief interventions.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials that used screening as a precursor to brief intervention.

settingGeneral practice.

main outcome measuresNumber needed to treat, proportion of patients positive on screening, proportion given brief interventions, and effect of screening.

resultsThe eight studies included for meta-analysis all used health questionnaires for screening, and the brief interventions included feedback, information, and advice. The studies contained several sources of bias that might lead to overestimates of the effects of intervention. External validity was compromised because typically three out of four people identified by screening as excessive users of alcohol did not qualify for the intervention after a secondary assessment. Overall, in 1000 screened patients, 90 screened positive and required further assessment, after which 25 qualified for brief intervention; after one year 2.6 (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 3.4) reported they drank less than the maximum recommended level.

conclusionsAlthough even brief advice can reduce excessive drinking, screening in general practice does not seem to be an effective precursor to brief interventions targeting excessive alcohol use. This meta-analysis raises questions about the feasibility of screening in general practice for excessive use of alcohol.

Indexed as

AlcoholismBiasFamily PracticeHumansMass ScreeningPrognosisPsychotherapy, BriefRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk Reduction Behavior

Identifiers

PMID12958114
PMCPMC192891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.