Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12956615›Full record

ReviewPaediatric drugs2003

Vaccine therapies for the prevention of type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Nikolai Petrovsky, Diego Silva, Desmond A Schatz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatric drugs, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Microbial mimics supersize the pathogenic self-response.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Article
  3. A mutagenesis study of autoantigen optimization for potential T1D vaccine design.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Vaccine for Diabetes-Where Do We Stand?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Prevention of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus using a Novel Vaccine.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2011
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Approaches in type 1 diabetes research: A status report.International journal of diabetes in developing countries · 2009
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nikolai PetrovskyAutoimmunity Research Unit, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia and John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia. nikolai.petrovsky@anu.edu.au
Diego Silva
Desmond A Schatz
Canberra Hospital · AUUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

WHITE MATTER AND COGNITION IN PARKINSON'S DISEASEM01RR000082 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BYRNE, BARRY J · 1985 to 2009
$29.7M
NCRR NIH HHS MO1RR00082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes mellitus results from immune-mediated destruction of pancreatic beta-cells, leading to loss of insulin production. Strategies to prevent or reverse diabetes development include beta-cell protection, regeneration, or replacement. Recent advances in our understanding of the autoimmune process leading to diabetes has generated interest in the potential use of immunomodulatory agents that may collectively be termed vaccines, to prevent type 1 diabetes. Vaccines may work in various ways, including changing the immune response from a destructive (e.g. Th1) to a more benign (e.g. Th2) response, inducing antigen-specific regulatory T cells, deleting autoreactive T cells, or preventing immune cell interaction. To date, most diabetes vaccine development has been in animal models, with relatively few human trials having been completed. A major finding of animal models such as the non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse is that they are extremely sensitive to diabetes protection, such that many interventions that protect mice are not successful in humans. This is particularly evident for human insulin tolerance studies, including the Diabetes Prevention Trial-1, where no human protection was seen from insulin despite positive NOD results. Further challenges are posed by the need to translate protective vaccine doses in mice to effective human doses. Despite such problems, some promising human vaccine data are beginning to emerge. Recent pilot studies have suggested a beneficial effect in recent-onset human type 1 diabetes from administration of nondepleting anti-CD3 antibodies or a peptide from heat shock protein 60. Given past experience, however, large multicenter, double-blind, controlled confirmatory studies are clearly required and longer term toxicity issues of drugs such as anti-CD3 need to be addressed.Diabetes vaccine development would benefit greatly from the development of reliable surrogate markers of immunoregulation. These would allow faster and more efficient screening of vaccine candidates, and would also assist in the translation of vaccine doses from animal to human studies. Unfortunately, research funding bodies desperate to find a cure are embarking on expensive clinical trials without first addressing important underlying issues such as animal-human dose translation and possible mechanisms of action. No doubt this is due to pressure from their constituency to rapidly find a cure, but unfortunately this approach may slow rather than speed the development of an effective vaccine cure. However, despite the significant hurdles that remain, vaccines remain one of the most promising strategies to prevent type 1 diabetes, with major advantages including convenience, safety, and long-lasting protection.

Indexed as

VaccinesClinical Trials as TopicDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1HumansVaccines

Identifiers

PMID12956615
OpenAlexW1987502561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.